OFC 2018: Study compares 400G optical transceivers for next-gen datacenter networks

Created March 8, 2018
Technologies such as cloud computing have brought with them a storm of global data trafficNews and Business

Scientists have first analyzed and compared the cost evolution and power consumption of different 400-gigabit-per-second (400G) optical transceivers, providing guidelines for device vendors and users regarding the best choice high-speed transceivers for next-generation data centers. The international team of researchers will present their techno-economic evaluation results at OFC 2018, 11-15 March, San Diego, California, USA.

Technologies such as cloud computing have brought with them a storm of global data traffic, eating up large bandwidths demanded by applications such as video streams and online gaming. Studies show up to a 25-percent annual increase in data center interconnect applications, and this significantly high demand for data processing, computation and storage in data centers calls for increasingly high-speed optical transceivers to support growing data centers. Although 100G and 200G optical interconnects are widely used at present, 400G optical transceivers are expected to be a fundamental element in near future for both inter- and intra-Datacenter communications.

Low power future
Next-generation optical transceivers such as 400G, 800G or even 1.6T interconnects promise to use less power and be less expensive, smarter and smaller. To home in on how different designs of 400G transceivers would affect device cost and power consumption, and how these cost differences would eventually influence the cost of Datacenter networks, an international research team from Greece, Luxemburg and Spain have analyzed and compared the cost and power consumption of different 400G transceivers, and for the first time predicted each transceiver’s cost reduction trend over the next five years using a mathematical model.

The researchers further evaluated the cost and power consumption of constructing and upgrading the datacenter based on Facebook’s Fabric architecture using different transceiver-installation technologies, providing cost-effective and power-efficient connectivity solutions for different sizes of Datacenters. The team will present their techno-economic evaluation results at OFC 2018, 11-15 March, San Diego, California, USA.

‘Rapid 400G evolution’
“The 400G-transceiver market is one of the fastest evolving markets, and our study showed 400G transceivers provide more significant benefits compared to current generation transceivers in terms of cost and power consumption,” said Theodoros Rokkas, the primary author of the paper and a scientist working at Athens Information Technology, Greece in the framework of EU R&D project DIMENSION.

“We believe our analysis and evaluation can provide some insights and guidelines for device manufacturers and users regarding the best choice of 400G transceivers and the optimal transceiver-installation approach that can be applied in different Data Centers.”

To estimate the total cost of 400G devices, Rokkas and his colleagues broke the cost into three discrete parts: the cost of manufacturing the Photonic Engine — a system that uses photonic devices as the main component of an optical transceiver; the cost of purchasing the electronics, including digital signal processing (DSP) chips; and the cost for the optical and mechanical packaging of the transceiver module. They calculated the relative cost of several 400G transceivers based on the cost of a reference 100G transceiver. The total area of the chip, size of the wafer, number of devices, number of optical coupling connections and total achieved yield determined the difference in cost.

Similarly, to calculate the total power consumption of each of the transceivers, the researchers considered the power consumption of the three discrete parts separately. They also predicted the price evolution over the next five years using the extended learning curve model, a widely used mathematical function that estimates the future price of components used in telecommunication networks. According to Rokkas, the trend over time in device cost reduction is primarily due to technology maturity, and is predicted for the first time.

Five kinds of 400G
Rokkas said, “The five types of 400G transceivers we studied are all possible standard options that were examined by the IEEE P802.3bs technical group. The analysis revealed that 400G transceivers with a lower number of laser sources and higher Baud rate, i.e. data transmission rate, are superior than other transceiver types in terms of scaling, cost and power consumption. We expect this advantage to be more prevalent in the case of next generation transceivers (800G or 1.6T).”

To further understand how different 400G devices would eventually influence the cost and power consumption of Datacenters, Rokkas’ team conducted a network-wide analysis of Facebook’s Datacenter Fabric architecture by comparing interconnection scenarios using different 400G optical receiver technologies. They found that different sizes of Datacenters should employ alternative 400G transceivers to minimize the cost and power consumption.

For example, for small-size Datacenters, the short-range FR4 type of 400G transceiver module, appears to be the best option considering the less complex fiber infrastructure it requires relative to other types; while for mega-scale Datacenters, a combination using the short-range FR4 type and long-range LR4 type for different parts of the Datacenters has been demonstrated to be most promising, cost-effective and power-efficient option.

The next step, according to Rokkas, is to compare different material platforms used for photonic integration of optical transceivers, such as indium phosphide and silicon photonics, and evaluate the influence on the device cost and power consumption.

To find out more about this presentation, other talks and the exhibition visit ofcconference.org


This article was written
by Matthew Peach

Matthew Peach is a freelance technology journalist specialising in photonics and communications. He has previously worked for several business-to-business publishers, editing a range of high-tech magazines and websites.